I went to United Cinemas Toshimaen to see
Gravitiy in IMAX 3D last night and was not much impressed. I guess my
expectation was excessive because of the reputation I heard from some friends
around me. I entirely admit that the technical staff did a great job in this
film, but the script itself was between the second and the third grade so to
speak. I don’t want to disclose the story elements here, but some factors that
deteriorated the reality in the story were, for example, Dr. Stone’s character
presented by Sandra Bullock was totally unlikely for an astronaut, and also
some scenes along the important storyline looked against the laws of physics.
One comment on the camera crews is, toward the
end of this movie, while I understand they had to choose a close camera setting to
achieve some 3D effect, the water splash on the camera lens could have stimulated
the reality of the situation, if only it were a documentary movie!
IMAX 3D seems still using a linear
polarlizer as I see noticeable visual
crosstalk with a slight tilt of the head. I think I should try Dolby Atmos theater in Maihama next time
considering the balance of 3D and sound quality.
Toshimaen Amusement Park in front of the Station |
昨夜はゼロ・グラビティを観に豊島園のユナイテッド・シネマズに行ったが、映画には感動しなかった。周囲の前評判の良さに期待が大きすぎたのかも。技術スタッフの努力はとにかく凄いよね、でも脚本自体が2流と3流の間くらいのグレードだった。ストーリーについてここでネタバレさせるつもりはないけど、サンドラ・バロック演ずるストーン博士の役作りが何しろ宇宙飛行士には全く不適合だし、ストーリー進行に不可欠なシーンの中には物理法則に鑑みてあり得ないような稚拙さも見受けられた。
最後の場面では水しぶきが撮影カメラのレンズにかかるのだが、ドキュメンタリー映画じゃないんだから、これは臨場感というより興ざめだと思う。もちろん3D効果のために被写体に寄せなくちゃならないのは理解しているけどね。
IMAX 3Dでは今も線偏光フィルターで立体を作っているようで、首を傾けるとすぐにクロストークが現れる。画質と音質のバランスを考えると、次は舞浜のドルビー・アトモス劇場で鑑賞してみたい。